Share
California is never boring when it comes to gaming politics. On one hand, you have the Kletsel Dehe Wintun Nation of the Cortina Rancheria has signed a new partnership with Australian social gaming powerhouse Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW).
On the other hand, lawmakers are trying to slam the brakes on Assembly Bill 831, which would ban sweepstakes casinos statewide. The collision was bound to happen, and now it has.
For Small CA Tribes, Sweepstakes Casinos Offer a Lifeline
The Kletsel tribe, with just 297 enrolled members, doesn’t have the advantage of sitting on a high-traffic tourism corridor with slot machines buzzing 24/7.
That is where VGW comes in. Through its economic development arm, KEDA, the tribe has agreed to host VGW’s free-to-play platforms, including Chumba Casino and LuckyLand Slots. For tribes far from tourist trails, digital deals like this aren’t just a nice bonus. They’re lifelines for housing, education, and health care.
California’s AB 831 Puts Sweeps Casinos on the Chopping Block
While the ink was drying on the partnership announcement, KEDA CEO Eric Wright was testifying before the Senate Appropriations Committee. His message was blunt: The bill, he said, “lacks unanimous support among California tribes” and tilts the playing field toward big casino tribes that already enjoy decades of head starts. In other words, the big fish want to keep the little fish from swimming in digital waters.
Opponents of California AB 831 came ready with numbers. They warned that outlawing sweepstakes casinos could wipe out over 1,200 jobs and erase $1 billion in yearly economic activity. Regulation, they argue, would be smarter — safer for players, better for the economy and far less messy than pretending sweepstakes casinos don’t exist.
Speaking on behalf of the Social Gaming Leadership Alliance at the hearing, Shane LaVigne of LaVigne Strategies said:
“Instead of a prohibition of online sweepstakes, we should instead regulate and tax it, which could generate between $200 [million] and $300 million dollars a year in new revenue to the state of California — funding schools, healthcare, and infrastructure without raising taxes on families at a time when the state of California could desperately use new funding streams, all while ensuring consumer protections are in place to create a safe gaming environment.”
Big Tribes vs. Small Tribes: The Online Casino Divide
Not all tribes are saying “aye” to sweepstakes gaming. Heavyweights such as the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians aren’t budging. To them, sweepstakes gaming is just a sneaky back door into online casino gambling that threatens their exclusivity.
It’s classic California gaming politics: tribes with casinos guarding their turf, tribes without casinos fighting for a chance to survive.
This isn’t just about sweepstakes or social casino sites. It’s about whether smaller tribes get a fair shot at economic independence in the digital age. The VGW-Kletsel deal marks a new front in the fight, and California lawmakers are stuck in the referee’s chair.
Will they choose protectionism for the big players or opportunity for the little ones?
