To Top

Wisconsin Sues Prediction Market Platforms, Alleging Illegal Sports Betting

Wisconsin sued several prediction market firms, including Kalshi and Robinhood, claiming they operate illegal sports betting sites
Wisconsin files suit against prediction market firms.
Photo by niroworld/Shutterstock
Ian St. Clair Avatar
2 mins read
Share Share
Copy link Share on X Share on Facebook Share on Reddit Share via Email

State of Play’s TL;DR

  • Wisconsin’s attorney general has filed suit against Kalshi, Robinhood, Coinbase, Polymarket, Crypto.com, and other platforms, alleging they facilitated illegal sports betting in the state.
  • This move lands weeks after Gov. Tony Evers signed a law legalizing online sports betting, but limited to tribal operators.

Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul has announced a lawsuit against multiple prediction market platforms, including Kalshi, Robinhood, Coinbase, Polymarket, and Crypto.com, accusing them of facilitating illegal sports betting in Wisconsin.

Kaul said the companies “flout” state law and that the allegations – chiefly that the platforms collect a fee for every bet placed – would stand regardless of the new tribal-only sports betting law signed by Gov. Tony Evers.

The AG held a news conference to unveil the filing and emphasized a recent surge in this type of activity.

Company responses were swift. Coinbase’s chief legal officer Paul Grewal invoked federal oversight by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and criticized state-level enforcement. Robinhood said its event contracts are CFTC-regulated through Robinhood Derivatives, LLC and will defend itself. Kalshi described itself as a regulated, nationwide exchange subject to federal jurisdiction.

Decision could be months or years away

If Wisconsin wins or secures injunctive relief, users in the state could see restricted access to the named platforms, frozen accounts, or altered product availability while litigation proceeds.

Operators named in the suit face potential civil penalties, legal costs, and reputational risk – and could pause marketing or new product launches in Wisconsin to limit exposure.

The core legal conflict pits state gambling statutes against platforms’ claims of exclusive federal regulation under the CFTC.

Expect rapid procedural skirmishes. Defendants will likely file motions to dismiss or move the case to federal court on statutory pre-emption and CFTC-jurisdiction grounds. The timeline could stretch months to years, with appeals possible if courts split on whether state gambling law can reach these products.

Based on reporting by Matt Smith for WISN12.

About the Author
VIEW ALL POSTS
Ian St. Clair

Content Lead

Ian St. Clair is a lover of words, vocal or written. Naturally, that makes Ian a great communicator and leader. Ian is curious and driven, always looking to improve, and always welcomes a challenge. Ian is authentic, possesses high-level emotional intelligence, and knows just when to crack a joke. A University of Northern Colorado graduate, Ian is now an expert in the US online gambling field, where he's been for over 5 years. Ian also has over a decade of journalism experience covering college and professional athletics, as well as the symphony and theater. Ian's a lover of history, news, and bacon. Oh, and tacos.

VIEW ALL POSTS
Sign up to our newsletter to get PlayUSA’s latest hands-on reviews, expert advice, and exclusive offers delivered straight to your inbox.
You are already subscribed to our newsletter. Want to update your preferences data?
Thank you for signing up! You’re all set to receive the latest reviews, expert advice, and exclusive offers straight to your inbox. Stay tuned!
View Offers
Something went wrong. Please try again later