To Top

Steve Friess: How Vegas Was Changed By Tiger Attack At Siegfried & Roy 20 Years Ago

Written By Steve Friess | Updated:
Steve Friess State of Play Siegfried & Roy

State of Play with Steve Friess

State of Play is a column that focuses on the trending stories in the casino and gambling space with sharp and clever insight from senior staff writer Steve Friess. Over his 25-year career, Friess has contributed to publications such as Newsweek, Time, New York Times and more.

The night Las Vegas changed forever, I was taking in a God-awful local theater version of Hedwig and the Angry Inch at some strip-mall shoebox where all the furniture had been requisitioned at local Goodwills or, more likely, dumpsters.

This being 2003, performances of edgy LGBT-ish fare were still rare in these parts, so gays of all denominations felt obligated to attend, which is why the moment the show ended and people turned their devices back on, phones and, yes, pagers started beeping all over the place.

I don’t remember everyone who was there that night, but I do know there were some prominent publicists and executives from what at the time was known as MGM Mirage. And then there was John Wilson, co-founder of the region’s dominant ambulance service, next to whom I was standing as he spoke to his dispatchers over the phone. I heard some key words: Mirage. Tiger. Roy. Siegfried. Hospital.

He hung up, turned to whomever was near, and in a mutter of shock, said, “You’re never going to believe this.”

Even now, it remains hard to digest. On Oct. 3, 2003, a 380-pound white tiger named Montecore nearly killed his master, the illusionist Roy Horn, onstage in front of thousands of patrons. It was a traumatic, gory news event, the primary focus of which was the fate of Horn.

In the week that followed, as he lingered between life and death only to be saved by a heroic but wild surgery. The surgery involved removing a piece of his skull and storing it in his abdomen until his cranial swelling subsided, the victim’s status largely dominated the story.

Unprecedented and never-repeated significance in Vegas

With the hindsight of two decades, it’s somewhat more clear that night is a line of demarcation, an unplanned if inevitable pivot in Las Vegas history of unprecedented and never-repeated significance.

There had been high-profile murders and deaths, of course, that altered the world of politics, the Mob and the music industry writ large. There were casino closures and openings that represented turning points, but they were all reasonably well-telegraphed and hyped. More onstage accidents would happen, too, even resulting in death, but those shows would, eventually, go on and on and on.

The Siegfried & Roy show, of course, did not. It ceased to exist in an instant, and with it an entire genre of Las Vegas entertainment was replaced. Some would suggest that this was inevitable, that the duo was getting on in years and bound to abdicate the gigantic marquee, but nobody associated with the production felt that way.

I had a short-lived fling with one of the show’s dancers, and that September he was just finishing up his business degree at UNLV. His plan was to stuff the degree in his back pocket for a few years because “I’ve got a job that I can keep as long as I want it.” The job vanished a couple weeks later, and he vanished days after his December graduation to perform on a cruise ship somewhere.

It would be too simple to say the tiger attack short-circuited the era of garish Vegas shows featuring dangerous animals. They did kick around for a little after, mostly in the form of journeyman illusionist Rick Thomas, who retired his tigers in 2013 and most recently was named Entertainer of the Year in Branson, Missouri. Today, animal acts don’t really exist in any serious way on the Strip.

The rise of Cirque du Soleil

But it’s much more than that. There is a direct connection between the loss of Siegfried & Roy and the accelerated rise of Cirque du Soleil. Remember, one reason Cirque became so popular and buzzy in the first place was that it was a circus without animals or name-brand stars — two variables that made an act like Siegfried & Roy especially vulnerable to disaster.

The media and its relationship to Vegas changed, too, that night. The Celebrity Journalism Industrial Complex suddenly realized Las Vegas was a hotbed of star drama and one that was yet to be oversaturated as Los Angeles and New York already were.

That lesson would be reinforced in subsequent months by the debut of Celine Dion’s show at Caesars Palace and Britney Spears’ momentary marriage to her childhood friend. People magazine put Roy and Montecore on its cover and, shortly thereafter, hired a full-time Vegas reporter.

For a certain set of more serious journalists, though, the events and aftermath of the attack on Roy also became an abject lesson in just how far certain forces in the Vegas publicity machine are willing to go to protect a myth.

Witnesses — that is, people in the audience without agendas who were staring right at the incident — told journalists they saw Roy bop the ornery tiger on the nose with the microphone before Montecore went, literally, for Roy’s jugular. Roy “looked like a rag doll in his mouth,” audience member Kirk Baser of Pennsylvania told the Associated Press.

Vegas spin machine in full force

Yet even with thousands watching what happened, the incident was spun. Steve Wynn went on KLAS-TV with an elaborate theory that a woman with a beehive hairdo in the front row distracted the tiger. Siegfried himself, as well as many emissaries, suggested the tiger — long billed as a veritable member of their family — was actually protecting Roy from some perceived threat.

At first, MGM Resorts brass insisted there was no video of the incident; later it was revealed there was and that the show was recorded as a matter of routine. Nevada’s U.S. senators even intervened, stopping the Department of Agriculture, which probes incidents involving animal attacks, from acquiring the footage.

When the USDA agreed to merely look at, rather than acquire, the video, Sen. Harry Reid considered even that to be a violation of Horn’s privacy. Only in Las Vegas, it seems, could someone argue with a straight face that a famous man mauled in plain sight of thousands of people had an expectation of privacy.

To this day, we don’t actually, officially, know what happened to Roy. Without access to the video, the USDA closed the probe with inconclusive results.

The illusion was shattered that day

The cover-up, too, was an attempt to hold onto the world pre-October 3, 2003. On that day an illusion was shattered. How could we believe anything other than that the animal instinct of a wild predator had surfaced?

Even now — after the deaths of Siegfried, Roy, and Montecore — defenders can’t let it go. I was interviewed extensively as the Voice of Reason on Steven Leckart’s outstanding 2022 limited-run podcast “Wild Things” that broke a ton of new ground about what happened.

Leckart got a pre-death confession from Reid about how he obstructed the investigation and why. But he also has key wild animal experts who, given all the available information, came to the obvious conclusion that I did: Tigers gonna tiger.

But this gaslighting effort, too, is a reason why this particular event would later be a turning point. Fifteen months later, a little site called YouTube would provide a way for ordinary people to provide the world uncensored video of events.

By then, more than half of all cell phones had cameras in them. By 2008, there was Twitter. If something like this happened today, the USDA wouldn’t need to ask permission to see video; the Internet would be flooded with footage from every possible angle.

Montecore’s attack, then, represents a brutal, unparalleled case study in before-and-after for Las Vegas. Twenty years later, the landscape is changed because it happened. For better? For worse? Hard to say. But different? Undeniable.

Read more from the State of Play column:

Photo by Lennox McLendon/AP photo; illustrated by PlayUSA
Steve Friess Avatar
Written by
Steve Friess

Steve Friess writes the State of Play column for PlayUSA twice a week. He's a veteran gambling-industry reporter who began covering Las Vegas in 1996 and covered the openings of resorts in Asia, Europe, and across the U.S. His bylines have appeared in The New York Times, Playboy, New Republic, Time, BusinessWeek, Newsweek, New York magazine, and many others. He, his husband, their children and three Poms live in Ann Arbor.

View all posts by Steve Friess
Privacy Policy