Share 
State of Play’s TL;DR
- DraftKings has won a lawsuit over a bettor’s voided parlay.
- The suit was in response to a shortened PGA tournament.
DraftKings has won an Iowa lawsuit over a bettor’s voided $14.2 million PGA Tour parlay tied to the 2024 Pebble Beach event. The operator and Crown IA Gaming are seeking $23,502.80 in court costs after judgment was entered on July 9.
A bettor, Nicholas Bavas, sued after DraftKings Sportsbook voided a $325 20-pick parlay based on the exact finishing positions of golfers at Pebble Beach. The dispute centered on the tournament being shortened to 54 holes after the Sunday round was called off.
Bavas had brought breach-of-contract and consumer-protection claims, arguing the wager should have been paid despite the event not reaching its scheduled finish. But according to the source report, the court entered judgment in favor of DraftKings and Crown IA Gaming, the licensed sportsbook tied to the case through the Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission.
Sportsbooks’ house rules win out
The sports betting case is a reminder that bet settlement can turn on sportsbook rules when an event does not run as originally scheduled. In this dispute, the shortened tournament format became the key issue behind whether the parlay stood or was voided.
Bavas’ lawyer described sportsbook governance as “a dizzying array of interlocking sets of rules that may or may not govern each bet depending on the type of wager placed, the specific event, and the particular sport.”
For bettors, the ruling underscores a basic but important point: Long-shot parlays can hinge not only on the outcome itself but also on how house rules apply when weather or other disruptions alter an event. The case was moved from state to federal court in May 2025.
Based on reporting by Richard Janvrin for Casinocom.
