To Top

Washington AG Seeks Shutdown of 16 Social Casino Apps in New Lawsuit

Washington Attorney General Nick Brown wants 16 social casino apps shut down and is seeking more than $225 million in player spending
WA AG targets 16 social casinos in lawsuit.
Photo by Andrey_Popov/Shutterstock
Ian St. Clair Avatar
2 mins read
Share Share
Copy link Share on X Share on Facebook Share on Reddit Share via Email

State of Play’s TL;DR

  • Washington’s attorney general is asking a judge to shutter 16 social casinos.
  • The state looks to recover more than $225 million.

Washington Attorney General Nick Brown is asking a King County judge to shut down 16 social casino-style mobile apps and recover the money that residents spent on virtual coins and credits.

The case could turn on whether those digital items qualify as a “thing of value” under state law.

The AG’s lawsuit targets Playtika, Aristocrat, and affiliated companies behind apps offering virtual slots, poker, bingo, and similar gambling-style games.

According to the complaint, more than 150,000 Washington players used the platforms each month.

Playtika says state gaming brochure protects it

The state alleges Washington users made more than eight million purchases worth over $151 million on Playtika-developed apps since September 2020. It also alleges 2.3 million purchases worth at least $74 million on Aristocrat apps over the same period. Brown is seeking to recoup more than $225 million in total spending.

At the center of the case is a familiar social casino defense: Players cannot directly cash out virtual coins. But the lawsuit argues the apps still may violate Washington law because the coins and rewards can function as a “thing of value,” including what the state describes as “a privilege of playing at a game or scheme without charge.”

The complaint also alleges users suffered financial and emotional harm.

The filing raises another issue likely to get attention beyond Washington: underage access. The state says the platforms did not require age-identification information, creating a risk that minors could use gambling-style apps.

Playtika has already moved to dismiss the case. In its filing, it cited a 2014 Washington State Gambling Commission brochure that said: “No Prize = No Gambling = OK To Play.” That argument tees up the core legal question for the court: whether virtual currency, extra play, or app-based rewards are enough to trigger Washington’s gambling laws even without direct cash redemption.

Based on reporting by Grant Mitchell for Casinocom.

About the Author
VIEW ALL POSTS
Ian St. Clair

Content Lead

Ian St. Clair is a lover of words, vocal or written. Naturally, that makes Ian a great communicator and leader. Ian is curious and driven, always looking to improve, and always welcomes a challenge. Ian is authentic, possesses high-level emotional intelligence, and knows just when to crack a joke. A University of Northern Colorado graduate, Ian is now an expert in the US online gambling field, where he's been for over 5 years. Ian also has over a decade of journalism experience covering college and professional athletics, as well as the symphony and theater. Ian's a lover of history, news, and bacon. Oh, and tacos.

VIEW ALL POSTS
Sign up to our newsletter to get PlayUSA’s latest hands-on reviews, expert advice, and exclusive offers delivered straight to your inbox.
You are already subscribed to our newsletter. Want to update your preferences data?
Thank you for signing up! You’re all set to receive the latest reviews, expert advice, and exclusive offers straight to your inbox. Stay tuned!
View Offers
Something went wrong. Please try again later