To Top

Citizens Research Downplays Threat from Prediction Markets on Sports Betting

Citizens Research says it doesn’t think prediction markets will make much of a dent into revenue streams of traditional sportsbooks
Citizens downplays threat from prediction markets on sports betting revenue.
Photo by La Famiglia/Shutterstock
PlayUSA News Team Avatar
2 mins read
Share Share
Copy link Share on X Share on Facebook Share on Reddit Share via Email

State of Play’s TL;DR

  • Citizens Research reiterated a Market Outperform on PENN Entertainment and says betting exchanges pose limited near‑term risk to incumbent sportsbooks.
  • That stance signals continued relevance of traditional US betting apps for most players and frames exchange platforms as a niche, not an immediate disruptor to operator profits.

Citizens Research maintained a Market Outperform rating and a $24 price target on PENN Entertainment while arguing that betting exchanges (prediction/peer‑to‑peer markets) are unlikely to meaningfully dent sports betting profitability for incumbent operators in legalized US states.

The firm – which covers DraftKings, Flutter, MGM Resorts, Caesars, PENN, and Rush Street Interactive – said the “No. 1 selling point of better pricing is not true for now,” noting that many bettors are not price sensitive and prefer the larger betting menus and product features on traditional apps.

Citizens also set targets, including $34 for DraftKings and Caesars, $195 for Flutter, and $24 for Rush Street, and gave MGM Resorts a Market Perform. Citizens additionally flagged that exchanges like Kalshi have not delivered superior pricing in the most liquid sports markets.

Data show prediction markets not offering better prices

Citizens’ view suggests little immediate change to how most people place bets: mainstream sportsbooks still offer broader markets, in‑app features, and promotional incentives that keep general customer flow on traditional apps.

Price‑sensitive bettors may experiment with prediction markets, but the firm’s analysis indicates they aren’t consistently getting better prices on the most heavily traded events.

For operators, this reduces near‑term downside risk – incumbents can focus on product depth, customer retention, and promotional economics rather than an urgent defensive pivot to exchanges. From an investor perspective, reiterated ratings and price targets can stabilize sentiment around these names, even as analyst revisions (e.g., BTIG and UBS updating Flutter targets) keep volatility in play.

Operators developing prediction markets (notably Flutter) may still gain strategic upside if they can improve liquidity and pricing ahead of key seasons.

Based on reporting by Investing.com.

About the Author
VIEW ALL POSTS

The PlayUSA News Team provides everything you need to know about online casinos, sweepstakes casinos, prediction markets, sports betting, lottery, and all other legal gambling in the US. The content writing process for the PlayUSA News Team includes using an AI application but is edited and fact-checked by real-life humans. No piece of content is published before human eyes take a fine-tooth comb to ensure its accuracy, reliability, and trustworthiness.

VIEW ALL POSTS