To Top

Citizens Research Downplays Threat from Prediction Markets on Sports Betting

Citizens Research says it doesn’t think prediction markets will make much of a dent into revenue streams of traditional sportsbooks
Citizens downplays threat from prediction markets on sports betting revenue.
Photo by La Famiglia/Shutterstock
Ian St. Clair Avatar
2 mins read
Share Share
Copy link Share on X Share on Facebook Share on Reddit Share via Email

State of Play’s TL;DR

  • Citizens Research reiterated a Market Outperform on PENN Entertainment and says betting exchanges pose limited near‑term risk to incumbent sportsbooks.
  • That stance signals continued relevance of traditional US betting apps for most players and frames exchange platforms as a niche, not an immediate disruptor to operator profits.

Citizens Research maintained a Market Outperform rating and a $24 price target on PENN Entertainment while arguing that betting exchanges (prediction/peer‑to‑peer markets) are unlikely to meaningfully dent sports betting profitability for incumbent operators in legalized US states.

The firm – which covers DraftKings, Flutter, MGM Resorts, Caesars, PENN, and Rush Street Interactive – said the “No. 1 selling point of better pricing is not true for now,” noting that many bettors are not price sensitive and prefer the larger betting menus and product features on traditional apps.

Citizens also set targets, including $34 for DraftKings and Caesars, $195 for Flutter, and $24 for Rush Street, and gave MGM Resorts a Market Perform. Citizens additionally flagged that exchanges like Kalshi have not delivered superior pricing in the most liquid sports markets.

Data show prediction markets not offering better prices

Citizens’ view suggests little immediate change to how most people place bets: mainstream sportsbooks still offer broader markets, in‑app features, and promotional incentives that keep general customer flow on traditional apps.

Price‑sensitive bettors may experiment with prediction markets, but the firm’s analysis indicates they aren’t consistently getting better prices on the most heavily traded events.

For operators, this reduces near‑term downside risk – incumbents can focus on product depth, customer retention, and promotional economics rather than an urgent defensive pivot to exchanges. From an investor perspective, reiterated ratings and price targets can stabilize sentiment around these names, even as analyst revisions (e.g., BTIG and UBS updating Flutter targets) keep volatility in play.

Operators developing prediction markets (notably Flutter) may still gain strategic upside if they can improve liquidity and pricing ahead of key seasons.

Based on reporting by Investing.com.

About the Author
VIEW ALL POSTS
Ian St. Clair

Content Lead

Ian St. Clair is a lover of words, vocal or written. Naturally, that makes Ian a great communicator and leader. Ian is curious and driven, always looking to improve, and always welcomes a challenge. Ian is authentic, possesses high-level emotional intelligence, and knows just when to crack a joke. A University of Northern Colorado graduate, Ian is now an expert in the US online gambling field, where he's been for over 5 years. Ian also has over a decade of journalism experience covering college and professional athletics, as well as the symphony and theater. Ian's a lover of history, news, and bacon. Oh, and tacos.

VIEW ALL POSTS
Sign up to our newsletter to get PlayUSA’s latest hands-on reviews, expert advice, and exclusive offers delivered straight to your inbox.
You are already subscribed to our newsletter. Want to update your preferences data?
Thank you for signing up! You’re all set to receive the latest reviews, expert advice, and exclusive offers straight to your inbox. Stay tuned!
View Offers
Something went wrong. Please try again later