To Top

Fairfax County Casino Referendum Bill Clears Virginia General Assembly

A bill that calls for a referendum vote in Fairfax County on whether to build a casino in Tyson’s Corner has passed the Virginia statehouse
A bill that calls for a referendum vote in Fairfax County on a casino has passed the Virginia statehouse.
Photo by Rena Schild/Shutterstock
Ian St. Clair Avatar
2 mins read
Share Share
Copy link Share on X Share on Facebook Share on Reddit Share via Email

State of Play’s TL;DR

  • The Virginia General Assembly approved a bill that would let Fairfax County voters decide whether a casino can be built in Tysons
  • The measure now heads to Gov. Abigail Spanberger to sign, veto, or amend.

The General Assembly’s House and Senate approved SB 756 after multiple failed attempts in prior years, voting 55‑41 in the House and 25‑13 in the Senate.

The current text allows a referendum on a Tysons casino located within a quarter‑mile of an existing Silver Line Metro station and requires the casino to be part of a mixed‑use development of no less than 1.5 million square feet.

Earlier drafts briefly opened the door to county‑wide siting and a temporary casino operating up to five years without a referendum, proposals that stirred strong pushback. Local officials and the No Fairfax Casino Coalition – representing 40-plus organizations – urged Gov. Spanberger to veto the measure.

Fairfax Board of Supervisors Chair Jeff McKay said he would “continue to fight any and all efforts to jam a casino in Tysons,” while Sen. Scott Surovell, the bill’s sponsor, argued county leaders have been unclear about acceptable revenue terms.

County officials could refuse to schedule a referendum

The bill is an early signal that Northern Virginia remains an attractive development target if it becomes law. A Tysons casino could create a new retail sportsbook, drive local online casino (if the state approves online casinos) and sports betting marketing partnerships. It would also attract national operators seeking integrated‑resort footprints near the Washington, D.C. market.

Lawmakers debated revenue splits (Virginia’s usual formula leaves about 30% locally), and proposals around temporary operations raised concerns about bypassing local approval, issues that would affect operator economics and local tax receipts.

However, the outcome remains uncertain: the governor can amend or veto the bill, and the Fairfax Board may choose not to schedule a referendum even if the law is enacted, limiting near‑term market changes for operators and bettors.

Based on reporting by Beth JoJack for Virginia Business.

About the Author
VIEW ALL POSTS
Ian St. Clair

Content Lead

Ian St. Clair is a lover of words, vocal or written. Naturally, that makes Ian a great communicator and leader. Ian is curious and driven, always looking to improve, and always welcomes a challenge. Ian is authentic, possesses high-level emotional intelligence, and knows just when to crack a joke. A University of Northern Colorado graduate, Ian is now an expert in the US online gambling field, where he's been for over 5 years. Ian also has over a decade of journalism experience covering college and professional athletics, as well as the symphony and theater. Ian's a lover of history, news, and bacon. Oh, and tacos.

VIEW ALL POSTS
Sign up to our newsletter to get PlayUSA’s latest hands-on reviews, expert advice, and exclusive offers delivered straight to your inbox.
You are already subscribed to our newsletter. Want to update your preferences data?
Thank you for signing up! You’re all set to receive the latest reviews, expert advice, and exclusive offers straight to your inbox. Stay tuned!
View Offers
Something went wrong. Please try again later