To Top

Lumbee Tribal Council Advances Gaming Amendment in North Carolina

The Lumbee Tribal Council has agreed to have voters decide whether the tribe should build a casino in North Carolina
North Carolina tribe will ask tribal members if it should build a casino in NC.
Photo by Alexandros Michailidis/Shutterstock
Ian St. Clair Avatar
2 mins read
Share Share
Copy link Share on X Share on Facebook Share on Reddit Share via Email

State of Play’s TL;DR

  • The Lumbee Tribal Council has advanced a constitutional amendment to allow gaming on tribal land, sending the measure to a membership referendum.
  • This decision could set the stage for new casino development and revenue streams that affect regional gaming markets and local bettors.

On April 16, the Lumbee Tribal Council voted to move a constitutional amendment forward that would authorize gaming on Lumbee tribal land, clearing the required two-thirds threshold in a late roll-call vote.

The measure now goes to a tribal referendum where a “yes” vote would authorize gaming and a “no” vote would leave the constitution unchanged.

Supporters framed the change as an economic lifeline – citing potential funding for housing, health care, education and other tribal priorities – with District 11 representative Andrew Jacobs calling gaming the “strongest available option for future prosperity.” Chairman John Lowery argued that gaming revenue could dramatically expand the tribe’s budget and services.

Critics, however, warned the amendment concentrates appointment power in the chair, reduces direct oversight, and could invite federal review by the US Department of the Interior.

Casino could be years away

If tribal members approve the amendment, the Lumbee could pursue land-into-trust transfers and begin coordinating with the National Indian Gaming Commission, steps that are prerequisites to opening regulated gaming facilities.

Operators eyeing the Southeast should note that tribal projects typically involve multi-stage approvals (tribal vote, federal trust decisions, regulatory sign-offs, and possible compacts with state authorities), so market entry would take time. The governance concerns opponents raised – especially around board appointments and oversight – also matter to operators because they influence how revenue is allocated and how compacts are structured, which can affect supplier agreements, market access and long-term stability.

The next step is a tribal referendum for Lumbee members; if approved, leaders have said they will start the land-into-trust process and coordinate with federal regulators and the National Indian Gaming Commission. That timeline could span months to years and will likely include legal, regulatory, and compact negotiations before any casino opens.

Based on reporting by Suswati Basu for readwrite.

About the Author
VIEW ALL POSTS
Ian St. Clair

Content Lead

Ian St. Clair is a lover of words, vocal or written. Naturally, that makes Ian a great communicator and leader. Ian is curious and driven, always looking to improve, and always welcomes a challenge. Ian is authentic, possesses high-level emotional intelligence, and knows just when to crack a joke. A University of Northern Colorado graduate, Ian is now an expert in the US online gambling field, where he's been for over 5 years. Ian also has over a decade of journalism experience covering college and professional athletics, as well as the symphony and theater. Ian's a lover of history, news, and bacon. Oh, and tacos.

VIEW ALL POSTS
Sign up to our newsletter to get PlayUSA’s latest hands-on reviews, expert advice, and exclusive offers delivered straight to your inbox.
You are already subscribed to our newsletter. Want to update your preferences data?
Thank you for signing up! You’re all set to receive the latest reviews, expert advice, and exclusive offers straight to your inbox. Stay tuned!
View Offers
Something went wrong. Please try again later