Share 
State of Play’s TL;DR
- March saw three states – Virginia, Maryland and Massachusetts – fail to advance online casino legalization, stalling iGaming momentum.
- This pause keeps potential new markets closed to players and delays expected tax revenue and market entry for operators while regulators and lawmakers regroup.
March turned into a setback for online casino supporters as bills in Virginia, Maryland, and Massachusetts stalled or were sidelined.
In Virginia, differences between House and Senate versions of HB 161 and SB 118 (mainly around problem gambling funding and a proposed ‘‘hold harmless’’ fund) could not be resolved in conference, and the Legislature pushed potential action to 2027 amid limited gubernatorial support.
Sen. Ron Watson’s SB 885 (and a withdrawn poker-only SB 884) failed to clear the Budget and Taxation Committee before crossover in Maryland, with problem gambling and cannibalization concerns cited.
In Massachusetts, Rep. David Muradian’s HB 4431 was voted to study by committee and effectively stalled; a separate Sen. John Keenan sports betting overhaul (S 302) would drastically tighten rules if advanced, including a proposed jump in tax rates and strict player limits.
Maine adds online casinos but sparks lawsuit
For players in these states, the immediate effect is continued reliance on existing retail casinos and sportsbooks instead of regulated online casinos, meaning no new in-state iCasino apps, games, or local promotions for the near term.
Operators lose potential new revenue streams and market expansion plans; licensors and platform vendors face delayed deals and uncertain ROI timelines. The policy debates that killed these bills – problem gambling mitigation, cannibalization of land-based casinos, and tax splits – signal tougher negotiations ahead.
What it all means:
- Consumers: No new legal online casino choices in the three states; possible future restrictions on betting product types (Massachusetts’ S 302 could ban in-play bets and tighten affordability checks).
- Operators: Slower market entry and continued competition from neighboring states where online casinos are legal; higher compliance scrutiny if bills return.
- Market dynamics: Momentum now shifts to states with active or better-organized coalitions (notably Illinois and New York), though both face union and stakeholder opposition. Notably, Illinois meetings with the VGT industry produced the blunt assessment that ‘‘there is no shot’’ of online casinos without their buy-in, underscoring political obstacles.
The one bright spot for online casino legalization was Maine. Online casinos become legal in July after the Gov. Janet Mills chose to allow the bill to become law without her signature. It’s implementation, however, is now up in the air after the state was sued by a commercial casino for allowing online casinos only through the state’s tribes.
Based on reporting by Steve Ruddock for Casino Reports.
