Share 
State of Play’s TL;DR
- Tribal leaders are backing Rep. Blake Moore’s Event Contract Enforcement Act to curb unregulated sports betting offered through prediction market event contracts.
- The bill aims to clarify the Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s authority and reinforce tribal and state control over gambling, a development with direct relevance to online bettors and operators across the U.S.
The California Nations Indian Gaming Association (CNIGA) publicly endorsed the Event Contract Enforcement Act introduced by Rep. Blake Moore (R‑UT) with co‑sponsor Rep. Salud Carbajal (D‑CA).
CNIGA Chairman James Siva criticized prediction market sports event futures as “illegal betting operations,” saying they undermine tribal sovereignty and state regulatory frameworks. The Santa Ynez Band of Chumash Indians also backed the bill; Chairman Kenneth Kahn warned these platforms siphon revenue vital for tribal services like health care and education.
The legislation clarifies that event contracts used for gaming outside established, legal regulatory frameworks violate the Commodity Exchange Act and fall outside the Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s (CFTC) permissible scope. CNIGA says it will work with Congress to close this regulatory loophole being exploited by prediction markets.
Bill aimed at sports contracts
The legislation signals potential removal or restriction of certain prediction market offerings that resemble traditional sports betting.
If enacted, the bill would strengthen enforcement against platforms offering event contracts that facilitate wagering outside state and tribal regulatory schemes, which could reduce access to unregulated markets but also protect consumers by driving activity into licensed operators.
Licensed casinos and tribal gaming entities stand to recover market share and revenue streams currently diverted by these platforms, supporting tribal public services. Operators of prediction markets face heightened legal risk and may need to redesign products, pursue licensing where applicable, or withdraw contested contracts.
Regulators – including the CFTC and state gaming authorities – would gain clearer statutory footing to act, potentially prompting coordination across federal and state agencies.
The bill must pass through the House and Senate and receive presidential approval before becoming law.
Based on reporting by IndianGaming.com.
