To Top

Tribes Push Hub-and-Spoke Model to Protect Online Gaming

Tribes in Wisconsin favor the hub-and-spoke model for gaming, with them being the hub and offering online gaming across the state (spokes)
Tribes favor hub-and-spokes model for online gaming.
Photo by vektorjunkie/Shutterstock
Ian St. Clair Avatar
2 mins read
Share Share
Copy link Share on X Share on Facebook Share on Reddit Share via Email

State of Play’s TL;DR

  • Tribal leaders are backing a state-tribal “hub-and-spoke” system to block out-of-state online platforms and protect tribal gaming revenue.
  • This push, highlighted by Wisconsin’s Assembly Bill 601, aims to preserve tribal sovereignty and keep online betting governed at the state level rather than through federal loopholes.

Online platforms that market prediction markets and similar products operate under federal oversight, allowing them to reach consumers across state lines and sidestep state compacts that protect tribal exclusivity.

Tribal leaders, including Victor Rocha of the Indian Gaming Association, argue this is “a violation of states’ rights and tribal sovereignty.”

Tribes are pointing to the Seminole Tribe of Florida 2021 compact’s hub-and-spoke model, where a tribal casino hosts servers (the “hub”) and makes gaming available to devices (the “spokes”) within the state.

Wisconsin’s Assembly Bill 601 – advanced Feb. 19 – would let the state’s 11 federally recognized tribes adopt that model, allowing them to host and control online wagering within Wisconsin. Proponents such as Dominic Ortiz of Potawatomi Casino say the approach curbs offshore and unregulated operators while preserving tribal revenue streams and jobs.

Hub-and-spoke model protects consumers and tribes

A tribe-run hub-and-spoke system means online wagering offered through tribal infrastructure would be clearly regulated at the state level, potentially improving consumer protections, tax collection, and responsible gambling measures.

For operators, tribes would gain exclusive rights to offer mobile betting within state borders – reducing market share for out-of-state prediction platforms that currently exploit federal regulatory gaps.

Key practical outcomes:

  • Consumers: Receive clearer legal frameworks and state-based oversight rather than patchy federal coverage; potential changes in app availability and geolocation enforcement.
  • Tribes: Get protection of revenue that funds community services (language programs, elder care, infrastructure) and reinforcement of sovereignty.
  • Operators & Regulators: See a likely shift in market dynamics as states consider compacts or legislation mirroring the Seminole model; continued legal and regulatory friction with entities arguing prediction markets are commodities.

Wisconsin’s Senate is expected to reconvene March 17 to advance consideration of the bill.

Based on reporting by Amelia Schafer for ICT News.

About the Author
VIEW ALL POSTS
Ian St. Clair

Content Lead

Ian St. Clair is a lover of words, vocal or written. Naturally, that makes Ian a great communicator and leader. Ian is curious and driven, always looking to improve, and always welcomes a challenge. Ian is authentic, possesses high-level emotional intelligence, and knows just when to crack a joke. A University of Northern Colorado graduate, Ian is now an expert in the US online gambling field, where he's been for over 5 years. Ian also has over a decade of journalism experience covering college and professional athletics, as well as the symphony and theater. Ian's a lover of history, news, and bacon. Oh, and tacos.

VIEW ALL POSTS
Sign up to our newsletter to get PlayUSA’s latest hands-on reviews, expert advice, and exclusive offers delivered straight to your inbox.
You are already subscribed to our newsletter. Want to update your preferences data?
Thank you for signing up! You’re all set to receive the latest reviews, expert advice, and exclusive offers straight to your inbox. Stay tuned!
View Offers
Something went wrong. Please try again later