Massachusetts has a governor (Charlie Baker) with a perpetual pen in hand to sign a sports betting bill, a legislature that keeps filing them, a citizenry that wants one, and, for good measure, one of the United States’ biggest operators (DraftKings) headquartered in the state capitol.
But the state of nearly 7 million residents continues to slog toward the possible (eventual?) legalization of Massachusetts sports betting.
On Thursday, state legislators prove yet again this is a (Boston) marathon, not a sprint.
The good news for those interested in legal sports betting in Massachusetts? The Senate passed a sports betting bill sent to it last week by the Ways and Means Committee on Friday.
But S.2844, is different enough from the version overwhelmingly approved by the House last year that it’s likely going to be contentious. Lawmakers would have three months to reconcile the bills if S.2844 passes the Senate.
Differences between the two Massachusetts sports betting bills
Key differences are:
- The new version of S.2844 does not prohibit betting on college sports. While Boston’s collection of top-four professional sports leagues would be expected to garner most of the legal wagering public’s attention, Massachusetts is chocked with high-profile athletic programs.
Someone somewhere would be pretty irked at not being able to lay a few bucks down on the Beanpot tournament, although most outside of New England don’t know what that is.
House Speaker Ronald Mariano told Bloomberg Baystate Business that a bill without college wagering “probably would be” enough to lose his support. Mariano seems to believe residents would be more attracted to college betting than on the Bruins, Celtics, Patriots, and Red Sox.
“I find myself having a tough time trying to justify going through all of this to not include probably the main driver of betting in the commonwealth,” he told MassLive last summer.
- No funding for sports wagering accounts with credit cards, although the practice has become commonplace nationally. Sen. Eric Lesser, who, according to MassLive, has,
“Largely led the Senate’s efforts around sports betting,” seems entrenched.
“The idea that somebody somewhat impulsively could rack up massive credit card bills from their couch who might have an addiction issue or otherwise have a gambling problem — that’s a big concern, and it’s a big concern to our caucus,” he said.
- Online and retail wagering would be allowed at gaming licensees Plainridge Park Casino, MGM Springfield, and Encore Boston Harbor, with up to six retail and mobile outlets as approved by the Massachusetts Gaming Commission.
- The Senate bill would tax operators at 20% on gross wagering receipts for retail bets and 35% via digital; the House version set the rates at 12.5% and 15%.
There are entrenched opinions on all sides. In 2020, administrators at Boston College, Boston University, the College of Holy Cross, Harvard, Merrimack College, Northeastern, and UMass lobbied lawmakers to ban college betting because,
“Unnecessary and unacceptable risk to student-athletes, their campus peers, and the integrity and culture of colleges and universities in the Commonwealth.”
Currently, betting on in-state colleges is allowed in roughly half of the 32 American jurisdictions where sports betting is legal and active. Several others prohibit prop bets on those teams.
Still Massachusetts is making progress, say industry analysts
“More than 30 states allow for legal, regulated sports betting, and it’s time for Massachusetts to follow suit. The central benefit to passing sports betting legislation is simple: by legalizing, legitimizing, and regulating sports betting, we are able to adequately track the industry and its customers to ensure a safe, fun, and transparent space. Given Governor Baker’s support of legalized sports wagering, I find it likely that he will ultimately sign the bill, setting up Massachusetts as the 31st state to reap the benefits of legal sports betting.”
Martin Lycka, SVP for American Regulatory Affairs and Responsible Gambling for Entain
“The Massachusetts Senate’s decision to pass S.2844 may ultimately yield benefits for the state, taxpayers, and- most importantly-gamblers themselves. This legislation includes extensive safeguards to ensure responsible gambling, and by passing it, the Senate has moved the Bay State one step closer to having a safe, regulated sports betting industry.”
Bill Pascrell, III, Partner at Princeton Public Affairs Group