Share 
State of Play’s TL;DR
- A Fairfax casino measure cleared the Legislature while online casino legalization failed, keeping in-person expansion on a conditional path.
- This development puts Northern Virginia back in play for brick‑and‑mortar casino development but leaves internet-based gaming off the table for now.
Senate Bill 756, sponsored by Sen. Scott Surovell, cleared conference and would add Fairfax County to the list of localities eligible to host a casino, according to the Virginia Legislative Information System.
The bill requires any casino to be part of a mixed‑use development of at least 1.5 million square feet and mandates voter approval through a local referendum before any project can proceed.
A state fiscal analysis found no immediate fiscal impact unless a project moves forward after a successful referendum; the measure now heads to the governor.
Separately, Senate Bill 661 – establishing state oversight for electronic skill game machines – also passed both chambers and is pending gubernatorial consideration, though its enforcement and corrections costs remain largely undetermined.
Efforts to legalize online casino gaming (House Bill 161 and Senate Bill 118) failed in conference, and sweepstakes casino gaming (Senate Bill 579) was continued to 2027.
The Virginia Council on Problem Gambling reports problem gambling calls rose 39% in 2025, underscoring growing social demand for support.
Spike in problem gambling calls could impact decisions
Adding Fairfax to the eligible list opens a valuable Northern Virginia market, but the 1.5 million‑square‑foot mixed‑use requirement and the need for a local referendum raise the bar for projects – favoring deep‑pocketed developers and slowing fast entry.
Players in Northern Virginia could eventually see new brick‑and‑mortar options, but internet casino prospects remain stalled, so online bettors will see little regulatory change in the near term. Regulators moving to cover electronic skill machines could shrink “gray‑market activity” and impose licensing or enforcement costs on operators who run those devices.
The continued delay on sweepstakes regulation keeps parts of the market in legal uncertainty.
Rising problem gambling calls signal that any expansion will come under increased public‑health and regulatory scrutiny, which operators should factor into compliance and responsible gambling programs.
Both SB 756 and SB 661 now await the governor’s decision; if signed, Fairfax projects would still require local referenda and the lengthy development commitments tied to the mixed‑use requirement. Online casino bills that failed in conference are unlikely to return this session, while sweepstakes rules are deferred to 2027.
Based on reporting by Shirleen Guerra for The Center Square, republished by CBS19News.
