Share 
A Virginia Senate committee advanced a bill Wednesday, Jan. 28, to legalize and regulate real-money online casinos, reviving a measure that had previously stalled in the General Assembly. The legislation gained significant momentum after lawmakers introduced substantial amendments designed to strengthen player protection provisions and increase corporate accountability.
Senate pivot: SB 118 clears key committee hurdle
In a 9–6 vote, the Senate General Laws and Technology Committee approved SB 118, clearing the path for the bill to be heard by the Senate Finance Committee. In addition to legalizing digital table games and online slots, the bill includes a provision to ban “sweepstakes-style” gaming establishments. These platforms, which have proliferated across the state, currently operate in a legal gray area that many lawmakers have labeled a public nuisance.
The measure is a cornerstone of a broader legislative push to overhaul Virginia’s gambling laws. During the same session, the committee advanced two related bills: one targeting daily fantasy sports with stringent new operational restrictions, and another that would establish the Virginia Gaming Commission. This new body would centralize oversight for all betting activities in the Commonwealth, including sports wagering, horse racing, and the newly proposed online casino market.
New monitoring requirements for gaming firms
Legislators stressed that the recent revisions stemmed from months of in-depth discussions with advocates and industry experts. The focus was primarily on tools to encourage responsible play and strict limits on how users fund their accounts.
Proponents of the Virginia online casino bill claimed the updated language sets some of the strictest national standards for mitigating gambling risks. Specifically, the new version requires online operators to use real-time player data for ongoing monitoring. Companies must watch for behavioral “red flags,” such as drastic increases in bet sizes, chasing losses, or maintaining play for dangerously long periods.
A structured three-step system would be mandated by law:
- Initial Intervention: Operators must provide pop-up warnings and educational resources on responsible gaming.
- Hard Limits: Continued high-risk behavior triggers mandatory deposit limits or short-term “cool-off” breaks.
- Account Termination: In extreme situations where addiction is evident, operators are required to close the account and provide resources for treatment.
While earlier drafts allowed users to opt into these features, the revised bill shifts the burden to the providers. It requires digital gaming firms to develop thorough strategies using customer data and advanced algorithms to proactively identify at-risk players. This pivot changes the regulatory focus from individual-initiated measures to mandatory, company-driven vigilance.
Where Virginia’s online casino taxes will land
The Virginia Lottery is slated to handle initial oversight, with each licensed land-based casino permitted to partner with up to three online platforms. The fee structure is significant:
- $500,000 application fee
- $2 million fee per platform license
- $250,000 renewal fee
- Revenue would be taxed at 15%
These funds are earmarked for several state programs. The Problem Gambling Treatment and Support Fund will receive 5% of the taxed revenue. An additional 6% would be directed to the Internet Gaming Hold Harmless Fund through Jan. 1, 2030, to protect against potential lottery revenue shortfalls.
Critics warn of lottery cannibalization
However, the bill faces stiff resistance. Oliver Barrie, representing the National Association Against iGaming, voiced strong disapproval, noting that Virginia would be just the eighth jurisdiction to allow such activities.
Barrie pointed to data suggesting a 5% drop in lottery revenues could follow the launch, potentially jeopardizing the nearly $900 million in annual funding currently directed toward public education. With Gov. Abigail Spanberger prioritizing economic affordability, critics argue that the potential $100 million annual loss to classrooms is a risk the state cannot afford.
